Smart Learning

Home » 2014

Yearly Archives: 2014

Stanford MOOC certificate

Our consultant received the Statement of Achievement for MOOC trainings by Stanford on-line MOOC:

MOOC Statement Certificate

Business model framework example for start-ups

We publish our own document as an example for young companies and teams: StartUps_BusinessModelFramework

New presentation added: Stakeholder management in 10 minutes

View it at:


PMP preparation

You have a very few time, and need more information how to prepare for successful PMP certification. Only for 54,90 Euro 3 on-line consulting’s per 4 academic hours (45 mins) each:

Also you may purchase an individual consulting for 16 Euro per hour!


Forum One Certificate


New examples for Software projects

We added 2 new examples of Software requirements specification and software use cases for free in Section three :)) –


We participate in the ForumeOne
Prisijunkite prie mūsų ForumOne (
Join the Microsoft COO Andreas Hartl session and the IAMCP ( community

IT business plan template (IT verslo planas šablonas)

We offer a detailed IT start-up business plan template absolutely for free: Start-Up_Business_Plan_Content

You may purchase your individual business plan. Our professionals prepare it for your company!

Brief IT service management for top managers (Trumpas IT paslaugų valdymas vadovams)

Enjoy and make value of our new presentation:
“Brief IT service management for top managers (Trumpas IT paslaugų valdymas vadovams)”

and join our advanced training: “IT Service management for non IT managers (CxO)” based on the ITIL(r) best practices.

Standaptation – standartization and adaptation for start-ups

Supporting start-up companies is one of the main branches for our company. We strongly recommend to read the article by Mr.

The original link to the article. 


Article (reposted from the LinkedIn):
As even SMEs/Start-ups start out on a global scale (how else do we tag an SME/Start-up with healthy social media followership?) , I pondered to myself, “Would the age long debate on Standardization and Adaptation hold (as it is a great deal for International entities attempting to play in specific local geographical locations)?”

An organization may either choose to run the same models across all its locations and through all its dealings irrespective of peculiarities WHILE another may decide to tailor its models according to the perceived diversities and requirements in the various locations and interactions with all contacts. Hence, the two forked road many travel - Standardization and Adaptation.

A man dressed in a custom-fitted suit is obviously differentiated from another with a standard-fitting suit. With no personal bias intended, one would most likely perceive these two men and possibly categorize them into two different schools of thought. This could also typically tell you one or two core things about them, if I wouldn’t be stretching it too much – personalty, ideologies, value systems etc may be scanned off a solution from being custom or standard fit.

I am of the opinion that at best a strategy would be efficient at capturing the ever swiftly changing needs of the end user while ensuring quality by keeping a standardized core while adapting the peripherals of that core. By this I typically mean that an excellent strategy should ensure standards with functionality but can then thrive with the flexibility of adaptation on the ‘contact’ end. In my experience as a Construction Project Manager, it is key to state that as much as a building’s aesthetics and eventual feel can be played with and amended to drive the ‘contact’ home, the structural elements can hardly be touched-for an edifice that intends to stand.

Having seen the slack that erodes working business models in the name of ‘Standardization’ and the lack of control that drowns established towering entities in the name of ‘Adaptation’, I have come to a swift rebellion that ‘Standaptation’* is the key to the future of strategy. Since I coined the expression, may I define

‘Standaptation as ensuring that the structural elements of an entity’s strategy is kept in sync while its peripherals are tailor made to adequately deliver quality. (where quality is defined as the degree to which the strategy meets requirement by the end user eventually either as a means to get financial consideration for profit making entities and/or a means to get obligatory considerations to non-profit entities). ‘ (c)Kayode Kolade,2014

I must agree that standardization helps plan effectively and ensure contingencies are in place and adaptation ensures efficiency in achieving business results.

Shall we then standardize for adaptability? Make a standard of adaptation?

What do you think?"